SIMBICON: Simple Biped Locomotion Control

Alex J. Champandard on August 12, 2007

This is the last article of the Siggraph 2007 coverage on Feel free to catch up with all the previous posts here (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).

This paper is from the University of British Columbia and introduces techniques for physically-based biped locomotion control. There are two contributions in this paper:

  • It provides a simple way to author biped controllers from specified parameters or mo-cap data.

  • To make the simulation stable, feedback error learning is used to control joints.

The result is a biped that’s stable when pushed and can deal with unexpected terrain. Large controllers can be easily created without expensive motion capture data, at the cost of realism.

A 3D manikin balancing after being pushed.

View or download the movie (MOV, 24 Mb).

Here’s the abstract:

Physics-based simulation and control of biped locomotion is difficult because bipeds are unstable, under-actuated, high-dimensional dynamical systems. We develop a simple control strategy that can be used to generate a large variety of gaits and styles in real-time, including walking in all directions (forwards, backwards, sideways, turning), running, skipping, and hopping. Controllers can be developed using motion capture data or can be authored using a small number of parameters.

The controllers are applied to 2D and 3D physically-simulated character models. Their robustness is demonstrated with respect to pushes in all directions, unexpected steps and slopes, and unexpected variations in kinematic and dynamic parameters. Direct transitions between controllers are demonstrated as well as parameterized control of changes in direction and speed. Feedback-error learning is applied to learn predictive torque models, which allows for the low-gain control that typifies many natural motions as well as producing smoother simulated motion.

Check out the 2D java applet, or download the paper (PDF, 0.8 Mb):

SIMBICON: Simple Biped Locomotion Control
KangKang Yin, Kevin Loken, and Michiel van de Panne
ACM Transactions on Graphics 26(3)

Here’s a quick assessment of the technology based on how easy it would be to use for upcoming games.

Applicability to games: 5/10
Having a physical controller is useful for generating animations without motion capture. However, games have come to expect a bit more realism than this version of the technology can provide. Like Natural Motion, it’s probably best used for short amounts of time before being blended back to real mo-cap clips.
Usefulness for character AI: 4/10
The controller is useful for dealing with pushes or balancing, but these are not major problems for game AI these days (simple animations can do a tremendous job here). Additionally, the walk controller isn’t fully stable on stairs; see the Java applet.
Simplicity to implement: 8/10
On the up-side, this is probably the easiest to implement. It requires a state machine with certain key poses, and simple proportional-derivative (PD) controllers. The feedback error learning isn’t required, but seems a great idea for tracking or retargetting mo-cap animations.
A state machine and a biped.

Biped motion from state machines.

Do you expect such technology to find a use in game AI?

Discussion 0 Comments

If you'd like to add a comment or question on this page, simply log-in to the site. You can create an account from the sign-up page if necessary... It takes less than a minute!